Re: WG-NOTE and Previous Version from Shane McCarron on 2014-02-15 (spec-prod@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:03:12 -0600
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAOk_reGqsJWnFunbAg8thgiqp5ofJ49kLSVrR0VyenTJ7i0g4w@mail.gmail.com>

No - notes do not require review.  A working group can just publish a Note
as a Note at any time.

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 13/02/2014 14:47 , Ian Jacobs wrote:
>
>> A Working Group Note does not need to have been previously published
>> as a Working Draft.
>>
>
> Right, but does that not make it a FPWG-NOTE?
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>
>

Received on Saturday, 15 February 2014 15:03:40 UTC