- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:12:19 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, spec-prod@w3.org, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
* Robin Berjon wrote: >On 13/02/2014 12:09 , Guus Schreiber wrote: >> The RDF WG is publishing a document as WG Note which hasn't been >> published before [1]. ReSpec complains that a "previous version" is >> missing, and puts in an empty <dt>Previous version</dt>. Are we doing >> something wrong or is a ReSpec update needed? When I removed the >> "Previous version" manually from the static version it passed pubrules. > >It seems likely that Notes will confuse me to the end of my days. > >My understanding of pubrules is that a WG-NOTE needs to have a Previous >Version. The NG checker agrees with me (but then again, I wrote it so...). "A Working Group MAY publish a Working Group Note with or without its prior publication as a Working Draft" tells us the Process document and accordingly some Working Group Notes do not have identifiable previous versions. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 14:12:47 UTC