- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:41:02 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, spec-prod@w3.org, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
On 13/02/2014 12:09 , Guus Schreiber wrote: > The RDF WG is publishing a document as WG Note which hasn't been > published before [1]. ReSpec complains that a "previous version" is > missing, and puts in an empty <dt>Previous version</dt>. Are we doing > something wrong or is a ReSpec update needed? When I removed the > "Previous version" manually from the static version it passed pubrules. It seems likely that Notes will confuse me to the end of my days. My understanding of pubrules is that a WG-NOTE needs to have a Previous Version. The NG checker agrees with me (but then again, I wrote it so...). For your document it would seem to me that you ought to be using the FPWD-NOTE status. In that case, there is indeed a bug that it requires a Previous Version — that's something I can fix. But before I fix anything I'd like to make sure that it needs to be fixed only for FPWD-NOTE and not WG-NOTE. Ian? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 11:41:11 UTC