- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:46:22 +0200
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi David,
On 16/10/2013 14:29 , David Wood wrote:
> contributors are to be denoted. Can you please inform us of the
> updated syntax? Thank you.
>
> We currently have a section that looks like this, which does not
> appear in the rendered documents:
> [[ otherContributors: { ...
I am not aware of there every have been an otherContributors
configuration field, it doesn't show up anywhere in the history log
either. Is it possible that this was something hacked in as an
extension? Where did you get that syntax from?
I see that the current draft uses the otherLinks configuration, which
exists and seems to work!
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Sunday, 20 October 2013 21:36:27 UTC