Re: ReSpec 3.2

That seems much better, thanks!  I will play with it more early next week.


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 18/10/2013 15:38 , Robin Berjon wrote:
>
>> On 18/10/2013 14:52 , Shane McCarron wrote:
>>
>>> I should have said that this was using Chrome on a Samsung Chromebook
>>> (ARM processor).  The Chrome version is 29.0.1547.74
>>>
>>
>> The implementations for the UI bits are loaded dynamically from GitHub,
>> but unfortunately there seems to be an issue with the cert at
>> github.io... which is causing blocks. I'm looking at solving that.
>>
>
> And it is now solved.
>
> One thing I forgot: people who wish to produce dual licensed W3C/CC-BY
> specs can now do so by setting license to "cc-by" in the configuration. (Of
> course, for now that only works for HTML extension specs.)
>
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>



-- 
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.