Re: ReSpec 3.2

On 18/10/2013 15:38 , Robin Berjon wrote:
> On 18/10/2013 14:52 , Shane McCarron wrote:
>> I should have said that this was using Chrome on a Samsung Chromebook
>> (ARM processor).  The Chrome version is 29.0.1547.74
>
> The implementations for the UI bits are loaded dynamically from GitHub,
> but unfortunately there seems to be an issue with the cert at
> github.io... which is causing blocks. I'm looking at solving that.

And it is now solved.

One thing I forgot: people who wish to produce dual licensed W3C/CC-BY 
specs can now do so by setting license to "cc-by" in the configuration. 
(Of course, for now that only works for HTML extension specs.)

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 14:03:48 UTC