- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:32:23 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org
Thanks, Robin! RI On 09/09/2013 14:14, Robin Berjon wrote: > On 06/09/2013 17:28 , Richard Ishida wrote: >> The status section of a document seems to disappear. This happened also >> when I tried the example doc at >> http://www.w3.org/respec/examples/minimal-w3c.html > > This bug has been fixed and the new build has shipped. Sorry for the > inconvenience. > > Dropping the SotDs was a distinct improvement to our specs — it's a > shame I had to fix it, really. > > Postmortem: a simple change to fix a small bug triggered this one (the > other bug was that the functionality that enables people to put the ToC > in a non-default location was not working). Unfortunately, the test > suite is rather unit-testing oriented and it so happens that the > situation that triggers this bug was not accounted for because it is in > the interaction between two things. > > Basically, the bug could only show if there was content that justified > generating a ToC (which was overwriting the SotD). The ToC tests didn't > care that there was no SotD. The SotD tests had no content, and so the > SotD did not get overwritten. > > The test suite has also been improved to take this into account. > -- Richard Ishida
Received on Monday, 9 September 2013 13:32:56 UTC