- From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 08:19:09 -0500
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reHmeHYGDXrAM6FD8AhqXV4kfA8rN2j0m5LQgRd37NutYA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Robin! On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On 06/09/2013 17:28 , Richard Ishida wrote: > >> The status section of a document seems to disappear. This happened also >> when I tried the example doc at >> http://www.w3.org/respec/**examples/minimal-w3c.html<http://www.w3.org/respec/examples/minimal-w3c.html> >> > > This bug has been fixed and the new build has shipped. Sorry for the > inconvenience. > > Dropping the SotDs was a distinct improvement to our specs — it's a shame > I had to fix it, really. > > Postmortem: a simple change to fix a small bug triggered this one (the > other bug was that the functionality that enables people to put the ToC in > a non-default location was not working). Unfortunately, the test suite is > rather unit-testing oriented and it so happens that the situation that > triggers this bug was not accounted for because it is in the interaction > between two things. > > Basically, the bug could only show if there was content that justified > generating a ToC (which was overwriting the SotD). The ToC tests didn't > care that there was no SotD. The SotD tests had no content, and so the SotD > did not get overwritten. > > The test suite has also been improved to take this into account. > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > > -- Shane P. McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Monday, 9 September 2013 13:19:40 UTC