- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 17:44:23 +0200
- To: shane@aptest.com
- CC: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 03/07/2013 17:35 , Shane McCarron wrote: > I note that somewhere along the line ReSpec was modified to generate > microformat compatible classes for things like authors. That's fine, > and it is not *inconsistent* with RDFa. It was definitely not meant to be :) > However, the way it is written > you get one or the other. That's just an artefact of us being banned from shipping RDFa by default because the validator rejected HTML+RDFa. If it were up to me, we'd always ship microformats, and RDFa, and microdata. > If you disable RDFa you STILL get microformats (since that is the > default right now). I think the validator accepts RDFa now, right? If so, I don't see the point in having a way to disable it. ReSpec has the metadata, it should be produced for all sorts of consumers without getting into politics. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 15:44:32 UTC