- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:35:00 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: shane@aptest.com, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 25/02/2013 16:29 , Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2013-02-25 16:24, Shane McCarron wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: >>>> I guess HTML4+RDFa might be. I will start lobbying for that now. >>> >>> I'll lobby for HTML5+RDFa, no point in downgrading perfectly fine >>> markup! >> >> The problem with it is that, while it may work in modern user agents, >> it does not in legacy user agents. And it does not in screen readers. >> And lots of other technology out there that we just don't encounter >> every day. The constituency of the W3C is broader than people who run >> the latest version of Chrome. > > It probably would be helpful if you gave a concrete example of a tool > that won't be able to properly display the text. Indeed, if this is true that's a serious bug in either HTML5, RDFa, or both. Concerned spec writers need to know! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 15:35:13 UTC