- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:29:19 +0100
- To: shane@aptest.com
- CC: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 2013-02-25 16:24, Shane McCarron wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> I guess HTML4+RDFa might be. I will start lobbying for that now. >> >> >> I'll lobby for HTML5+RDFa, no point in downgrading perfectly fine markup! > > The problem with it is that, while it may work in modern user agents, > it does not in legacy user agents. And it does not in screen readers. > And lots of other technology out there that we just don't encounter > every day. The constituency of the W3C is broader than people who run > the latest version of Chrome. It probably would be helpful if you gave a concrete example of a tool that won't be able to properly display the text. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 15:29:48 UTC