- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:58:10 +0200
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org
On 21/06/2013 16:46 , Richard Ishida wrote:
> When i changed to the latest version of respec, however, the source code
> went from:
>
> <div class="req">
> <p>[S][I] Specifications and implementations <em title="must not"
> class="rfc2119">must not</em> assume that content is in any particular
> normalization form. </p>
> </div>
>
> to:
>
> <div class="req"><a href="#undefined">Req. 13</a>:
> <p>[S][I] Specifications and implementations <em title="MUST NOT"
> class="rfc2119">MUST NOT</em> assume that content is in any particular
> normalization form. </p>
> </div>
>
> ie. adding an ugly and unwanted numbered link, that doesn't actually
> link anywhere.
I had no idea we actually supported this. That's clearly a bug though.
Would you mind filing an issue at:
https://github.com/darobin/respec/issues/new
With the description you give here and a pointer to your document? Then
I'll track down who added support for requirement numbering to see what
it is they had in mind.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 08:58:12 UTC