- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:06:44 +0100
- To: shane@aptest.com
- Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > I know that we have discussed eliminating the XHTML format / removing support for it. But today, for example, when I am publishing an updated XHTML+RDFa specification and really want the spec in XHTML+RDFa format, the support is still important. I note that there are a handful of recent changes that make the resulting output invalid. I am absolutely willing to submit fixes for this, but I want to be sure there won't be pushback from people. > > So, my question is "would anyone object if I were to update the XHTML generation so that it generates valid output"? No… though why don't you just run the output through HTML5 Tidy and get it to output XHTML? It might save you a bunch of time (and won't introduce code in to Respec that will only get limited use). -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 16:07:13 UTC