- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:10:47 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: spec-prod@frink.w3.org
Robin Berjon writes: > Henry, Henry, Henry... > > Have we ever thrown anything at you before? Well, maybe not . . . But an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. . . :-) > On 03/06/2013 16:00 , Henry S. Thompson wrote: >> I prefer to edit my specs in XML. I have a usable respec+XHTML source >> doc't, which previews correctly in browsers. Or, rather, I thought I >> did. >> >> It works with specStatus="unofficial", but not with specStatus="ED". >> In the later case, it fails (Chrome, Opera) with "DOM Exception 12" >> (Chrome), "DOMException: SYNTAX_ERR > > This is quite interesting. I don't recall ever seeing it before. Do > you have a pointer to the document in question? It will likely be > faster if I debug it myself. > > I have a suspicion that this may be an XHTML problem. Is there any > chance that you are not only editing your document as XHTML, but also > serving it as application/xhtml+xml (or, which amounts to the same in > some browsers, loading it from disk with a .xhtml extension)? Serving as application..., yes. > It's been a while since I've used XHTML in any form, but I have dim > memories of innerHTML not working there. That does ring a bell, yes. > If that's the case, I'm afraid the only fix will be to switch to > HTML (at least for the media type), because removing all uses of > innerHTML would be a major undertaking. The fact that it works with specStatus="unofficial" suggests that your use of innerHTML is pretty modest, so I have some hope . . . I'll send you a private note as to where you can find the doc't, as it's not ready for public viewing just yet. . . Thanks for your help, ht -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 15:12:15 UTC