- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:10:47 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: spec-prod@frink.w3.org
Robin Berjon writes:
> Henry, Henry, Henry...
>
> Have we ever thrown anything at you before?
Well, maybe not . . . But an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of
cure. . . :-)
> On 03/06/2013 16:00 , Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> I prefer to edit my specs in XML. I have a usable respec+XHTML source
>> doc't, which previews correctly in browsers. Or, rather, I thought I
>> did.
>>
>> It works with specStatus="unofficial", but not with specStatus="ED".
>> In the later case, it fails (Chrome, Opera) with "DOM Exception 12"
>> (Chrome), "DOMException: SYNTAX_ERR
>
> This is quite interesting. I don't recall ever seeing it before. Do
> you have a pointer to the document in question? It will likely be
> faster if I debug it myself.
>
> I have a suspicion that this may be an XHTML problem. Is there any
> chance that you are not only editing your document as XHTML, but also
> serving it as application/xhtml+xml (or, which amounts to the same in
> some browsers, loading it from disk with a .xhtml extension)?
Serving as application..., yes.
> It's been a while since I've used XHTML in any form, but I have dim
> memories of innerHTML not working there.
That does ring a bell, yes.
> If that's the case, I'm afraid the only fix will be to switch to
> HTML (at least for the media type), because removing all uses of
> innerHTML would be a major undertaking.
The fact that it works with specStatus="unofficial" suggests that your
use of innerHTML is pretty modest, so I have some hope . . .
I'll send you a private note as to where you can find the doc't, as
it's not ready for public viewing just yet. . .
Thanks for your help,
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 15:12:15 UTC