- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 09:27:20 +0200
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
Did the first (semi-) automatic merge from /TR today (ran scripts/rdf.js). Here's the output commit: https://github.com/tobie/specref/commit/46240442. Works like a breeze. This should be the end of manual updates to the biblio.js for all things W3C. :) Note we still have to decide what data the main entry should expose by default and then decide where to implement this (in the API, or in scripts/rdf.js). I'll be moving the repo to github.com/w3c in the near future. Best, --tobie On Monday, May 27, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: > This took a bit longer than expected. Was able to deploy today. LMK if you encounter issues. > > --tobie > > > On Friday, May 24, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: > > > Hacked a script that pulls tr.rdf data and turns it into palatable JSON. > > > > Now to combine it with the ordered list of authors/editors of specref and profit. > > > > Should be able to deploy the output later today. > > > > I'll keep the process manual for now. We can always automate it later on. > > > > --tobie > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: > > > > > > > On 20/05/2013 18:08 , Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > > > > > Regarding generating a new /TR page, it appeared clearly at TPAC that > > > > > the current version wasn't being used much by the W3C experts, mainly > > > > > due to its painful interface. Even if it is dangerous to extrapolate > > > > > from just one single session, I suspect that the feeling is relatively > > > > > general in W3C. The old /TR page was a simple list of the documents but > > > > > was getting quite long. My thinking has been that we may need a simple > > > > > TR page for the W3C community, which allows fast search/navigation, and > > > > > a more complex one for the Web at large. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One thing that I recall was brought up during the TPAC session (but I > > > > forget who said it) was that it would be useful to have some JSON dump > > > > of the TR information so that people could write their own interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure I've asked for this a few times. > > > > I > > > > forget if what came out was that that dump already existed but people > > > > didn't know where to find it, or if it wasn't but was easy to generate, > > > > but I recall (dimly) that there was general agreement that it could be > > > > useful (especially if CORS-accessible). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely. Would make keeping Respec's biblio up to date a breeze! > > > > > > -- > > > Marcos Caceres > > >
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 07:27:34 UTC