W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Update on the publication process project

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:03:37 +0200
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <93919E2EA20E41F3A77CDF233F98649B@w3.org>
This took a bit longer than expected. Was able to deploy today. LMK if you encounter issues.

--tobie 


On Friday, May 24, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:

> Hacked a script that pulls tr.rdf data and turns it into palatable JSON. 
> 
> Now to combine it with the ordered list of authors/editors of specref and profit.
> 
> Should be able to deploy the output later today.
> 
> I'll keep the process manual for now. We can always automate it later on.
> 
> --tobie 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> > 
> > > On 20/05/2013 18:08 , Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> > > > Regarding generating a new /TR page, it appeared clearly at TPAC that
> > > > the current version wasn't being used much by the W3C experts, mainly
> > > > due to its painful interface. Even if it is dangerous to extrapolate
> > > > from just one single session, I suspect that the feeling is relatively
> > > > general in W3C. The old /TR page was a simple list of the documents but
> > > > was getting quite long. My thinking has been that we may need a simple
> > > > TR page for the W3C community, which allows fast search/navigation, and
> > > > a more complex one for the Web at large.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > One thing that I recall was brought up during the TPAC session (but I 
> > > forget who said it) was that it would be useful to have some JSON dump 
> > > of the TR information so that people could write their own interfaces. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I'm sure I've asked for this a few times. 
> > > I 
> > > forget if what came out was that that dump already existed but people 
> > > didn't know where to find it, or if it wasn't but was easy to generate, 
> > > but I recall (dimly) that there was general agreement that it could be 
> > > useful (especially if CORS-accessible).
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Absolutely. Would make keeping Respec's biblio up to date a breeze! 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Marcos Caceres
> 
Received on Monday, 27 May 2013 19:03:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC