W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Let's update the Respec documentation!

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 18:03:12 +0000
To: <ishida@w3.org>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1CB2E0B458B211478C85E11A404A2B2701B684F8@008-AM1MPN1-033.mgdnok.nokia.com>
WG-NOTEs, especially for FPWD need clarification of the best practice.

for a note it is specStatus: "WG-NOTE",    (perhaps the other various options should be removed)

for FPWD NOTE I believe it is specStatus: "FPWD" , with sotd mentioning that it is Note track (if needed)  (despite the ever-confusing FPWD-NOTE option) 

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On May 24, 2013, at 12:40 PM, ext Richard Ishida wrote:

> Add somewhere How to publish a FPWD of a document not intended to become a Rec.
> 
> Iirc, off the top of my head, I think the secret formula is:
> 
> [1] set
>       specStatus: "FPWD",
> 
> [2] add the following line
> 	noRecTrack: true,
> 
> [3] add a sentence to the following as per
>  <p id="sotd">... The Working Group expects this document to become a Working Group Note.</p>
> 
> 
> hth
> RI
> 
> 
> 
> On 24/05/2013 12:17, Robin Berjon wrote:
>> On 24/05/2013 11:14 , Robin Berjon wrote:
>>> I've put up a wiki page where we can agree on how to best do this.
>> 
>> And you're all very happy to know that aren't you? I mean, whoa, a wiki
>> page and all! Maybe if we knew where it is we could even edit it!
>> 
>> *cough*
>> 
>> Here's the link:
>> 
>>     https://github.com/darobin/respec/wiki/DocumentationRewrite
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Richard Ishida, W3C
> http://rishida.net/
> 
Received on Friday, 24 May 2013 18:04:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC