- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:25:27 -0500
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org
Hey, fantasai- On 1/6/12 12:32 AM, fantasai wrote: > On 12/19/2011 10:08 PM, fantasai wrote: >> I have an issue filed on one of my specs for inconsistent >> capitalization, so I >> thought I'd post here and see whether there was any consensus on the >> correct >> capitalization rules. :) :) >> >> Pubrules is no help because it requires one style for "Status of this >> document" >> and a different style for "Table of Contents". (Yay!) >> >> Options under consideration: >> >> A. Titlecase Like This and This >> B. Sentencecase like this and this >> C. Titlecase for Top-Level Sections (<h2>), Sentencecase for >> lower-level sections >> >> Thoughts? > > Thanks everyone for responding! I use the titlecase convention Tab > describes, That looks good to me. > but I'm hearing consensus on sentencecase. Didn't seem like any consensus to me. (FWIW, I strongly prefer Titlecase, but I would, as an American.) > Can we get Pubrules Checker updated so that it looks for "Table of > contents" > instead of "Table of Contents"? If nothing else, it's silly that it > requires > different capitalization for that and "Status of this document". Yes, very silly. > I'll update the CSSWG's template. Regards- -Doug
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 06:27:44 UTC