- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 18:11:06 +0200
- To: Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr@cisco.com>
- CC: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, rfc-interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
On 2012-05-09 18:03, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > On 5/9/12 6:57 AM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker"<hallam@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> ...which means: little metadata or no metadata to rely on, right? >> >> I am not sure quite what you mean there. > > A really good example I've heard is "I want to pull out all of the ABNF and > run it through a separate tool to ensure it is correct". Imagine similar > markup for ASN.1 descriptions, etc. > > Metadata doesn't mean just author and publish date. Another one is: "I want to mechanically check that all IETF and W3C references are up-to-date". Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 16:11:45 UTC