- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:42:18 -0700
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 29 April 2012 at 05:11, Doug Schepers wrote: >> I think IETF, and the Web community, would benefit from a well-style >> HTML version of IETF specs. > > I agree. But, irrespective of how they look stylistically, I think most would just settle for normative HTML specs from the IETF with proper marked-up/linkable definitions, algorithms, and sections (and particularly, for the IETF deprecate the paginated text-only format so their is only one authoritative source in HTML). +1. Aligning the styles and structure would be cool, but unnecessary. All I want for Christmas is RFCs in HTML and utf-8, properly linked up and anchored. The fact that they still produce pure-text documents formatted for printing 80-column wide is either a travesty or a really awesome troll. ~TJ
Received on Sunday, 29 April 2012 15:43:08 UTC