- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:07:03 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
Hi, Anne- Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 2/17/10 4:02 AM): > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:51:59 +0100, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: >> >> The new home of the Proposed Spec Conventions is here: >> http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/spec-conventions.html > > This looks really cool! Thanks! > Though some of these rules seem incompatible > with the CSS pre-processor / Anolis conventions. I did take specific feedback from several CSS WG folks, but if you have other examples of incompatibilities, I am open to changing them. > For terms we use <dfn> but we use the title attribute as well to provide > detail, more or less per these rules: > > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20100204#l-529 Is this all of them? [[ dom-InterfaceName-attributeOrMethodName event-eventname elementname attr-elementname-attributename dom-elementname-attributeOrMethodName concept-word InterfaceName ]] What's the example usage here? Like, for @bar of <foo>, is this right? <a href="#foo-element" title="foo"><code class="element">foo</code></a> <a href="#bar-attribute" title="attr-foo-bar><code class="attr">bar</code></a> Seems reasonable to me, if a bit terse. > If everyone followed those rules we could have cross-references between > all specifications when that feature is implemented a little better. I'm all for that. > I suppose we can also alter those rules a little if people prefer a > different style. Now that we have people talking about it, let's decide what changes would need to be made, to either the spec-conventions doc, to ReSpec, or to CSS pre-processor / Anolis. I will change DOM3 Events to conform to whatever we decide. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 19:07:06 UTC