- From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:24:35 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Apr 15, 2010, at 18:23 , Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 13:36 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: > [...] >> This brings me to a more general question. Quite a few groups have started using ReSpec >> (I know of at least DAP, WebApps, MAWG, RDFa, XML Security, and I've seen commits >> to the biblio DB that seem to indicate more) but when this sort of problem arises >> I don't know how to get in touch with everyone. I also get a fair amount of feature >> requests and discussions about how to implement them that could probably best be >> discussed as a group. Should we have a ReSpec mailing list? Or should we officially >> highjack spec-prod at the risk of annoying its current denizens? > > You're welcome to use spec-prod as far as I'm concerned, at the risk of > being annoyed by discussion of other tools, such as xmlspec. I don't think that that would be an issue, I've been on spec-prod forever and it's not exactly a massive source of traffic :) I've now documented spec-prod as the official channel for ReSpec discussions. -- Robin Berjon robineko — hired gun, higher standards http://robineko.com/
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 09:25:05 UTC