- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:23:12 -0500
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 13:36 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: [...] > This brings me to a more general question. Quite a few groups have started using ReSpec > (I know of at least DAP, WebApps, MAWG, RDFa, XML Security, and I've seen commits > to the biblio DB that seem to indicate more) but when this sort of problem arises > I don't know how to get in touch with everyone. I also get a fair amount of feature > requests and discussions about how to implement them that could probably best be > discussed as a group. Should we have a ReSpec mailing list? Or should we officially > highjack spec-prod at the risk of annoying its current denizens? You're welcome to use spec-prod as far as I'm concerned, at the risk of being annoyed by discussion of other tools, such as xmlspec. It seems on-topic to me: "a public mailing list devoted to mechanisms for producing and managing W3C specifications." -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/ p.s. I'm not copying chairs@w3.org on this reply; cross-posting to member-only and public lists runs the risk that somebody will reply thinking it's a member-only discussion when in fact their reply will go into public archives. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:23:14 UTC