- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:47:12 +0100
- To: ij@w3.org
- Cc: chairs@w3.org, spec-prod@w3.org
Ian, I think it's right that existing RECs stay as they are, and that going forward we don't add text (eg sidebars and search links) to recs after they have been finalised by the appropriate WG, but it would certainly be possible (if that's what was wanted) to come up with a styling for future rec track documents more in tune with the new design. A tool that massages the "final form" html document is never going to be workable in practice, too many working groups produce their documents in multiple forms (html, xhtml, single file, multiple file, diff-marked etc) often by having modified xmlspec based workflows for each document variant. What's needed is to modify those workflows; not to add a further transformation stage to just one of the formats. If there was a specification for new style front matter, and for heading colours and sizes and image usage eg white w3c on blue rather than blue on white) or any other stylistic elements, and a version of the pubrules checker that could work with new style documents, I'd certainly be prepared to modify the mathmlspec/xmlspec stylesheets to produce something that would match a new TR style specification, and probably most other groups using variants of xmlspec markup could do something similar. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 16:02:09 UTC