- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:46:58 +0200
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Hi, With the increasing popularity of markup languages we see more and more specifications for such languages. One of the challenges faced by the editors of such specifications is how to encode information about the elements and attributes in the specification. Common information for an element would be which attributes it may have, which attributes are required, the syntax for the attribute values, which elements may/must nest inside such an element and in which order, include schema fragments and if, which schema language(s), and so on. Below is a list of such specifications with more or less random elements picked out. Each of them uses a (sometimes slightly) different approach. What I would like to have is an analysis of these differences, some documentation on what is out there, and derived guidelines for editors to make an educated choice and possibly to update the relevant tools to help with their choice. Naturally, conceptually different formats have different needs in this regard, a format for a simple data-oriented web service is different from a combined XHTML+SVG+SMIL+XForms+XML-Events+XBL+MathML+VoiceXML specification which is unlikely to ever exist even though some of us might find themselves authoring such documents at some point. Which is actually a good reason why specifications for the latter set of formats should integrate well with each other and an author trying to understand such a complex compound document format is certainly not helped having to deal with a dozen of different ways to describe con- ceptually very similar things. I am now looking for people interested in researching this topic and how this should be approached exactly. In general, I would like to have documentation of opinions about what is good and what is bad about the various approaches, and possibly a set of mini Technical Reports that describe the same very simple (like 5 simple elements) language where one can get a general feeling for the dominant approaches. It's usually sufficient to post such a message to some mailing lists; a bunch of volunteers will then tackle the problem and let me know of the results. Thanks in advance for this, you are a fantastic community! Here is the list: * http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-SVG11-20030114/struct.html#SVGElement * http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410/abstract_modules.html#s_imagemodule * http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-sXBL-20050405/#the-definition * http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-ietf-atompub-format/ * http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/#sec-CanonicalizationMethod * http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xslt-19991116#section-Defining-Template-Rules * http://relaxng.org/spec-20011203.html#full-syntax * http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/#element-attribute * http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050510/#Interface_XMLRep * http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#hrelementsOfLtitemgt * http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/struct/global.html#h-7.5.4 * http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-P3P11-20050701/#ENTITY * http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2629.txt * http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xkms2-20050628/#XKMS_2_0_Section_7_2 * http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-scxml-20050705/#N103B4 * http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part1-20030624/#faultdetailelement * http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12572/OpenDocument-v1.0-os.pdf * http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20050107/smil-timing.html#Timing-SeqSyntax * http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-MathML2-20031021/chapter3.html#presm.mi * https://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/docs/en/protocol.html#xmlTagDefinitions * http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/struct.html#SVGElement * http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice6.html#fo_inline * http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3920.txt * http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-emma-20041214/#s3.1.3 * http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xforms-20031014/slice8.html#ui-secret * http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-InkML-20040928/#inkElement regards, -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 18 July 2005 22:47:11 UTC