- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:53:56 -0400
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org, "Eve L. Maler" <Eve.Maler@sun.com>, Sabine Ocker <Sabine.Ocker@east.sun.com>
/ Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> was heard to say: | I'd like a few addition to the next version: | - would it be possible to define a namespace for the xmlspec elements? | http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xmlspec (or something like this). No. Doing so would break every existing stylesheet for xmlspec. | - would it possible to use xlink? ie s/href/xlink:href/ Yes. But it would be a significant backwards-incompatibility problem. Certainly not something I'd want to do before a 3.0 release. | - the DOM added two attributes on the DOM extensions in xmlspec: | <!-- | #1999-07-21: lehors: Added since and version attributes to most idl elements | --> | <!-- since attribute: | Provides the version in which the element was introduced. --> | <!ENTITY % idl-since.att | 'since CDATA #IMPLIED'> | | <!-- version attribute: | Provides the version in which the element was modified. --> | <!ENTITY % idl-version.att | 'version CDATA #IMPLIED'> | | Have a look at [1] to see where we use them. I quickly adapted your | version with what we're using today. If you add the two attributes, I'll | be able to use v2.2 without modifying at all. Good to know. Eve, Sabine, and I are (slowly) working on gathering requirements for 3.0 by looking at what extensions other groups have made. Ideally, we'll be able to produce a 3.0 that few groups will need to customize. | Some examples: | <method name="insertBefore" id="ID-952280727" version='DOM Level 3'> | <method name="getUserData" id='Node3-getUserData' since="DOM Level 3"> FWIW, I've become convinced that putting human readable text in attribute values is a bad thing. It's just not properly internationalizable. I suggest instead that you use a keyword in the version attribute and have the stylesheets "do the right thing". | - it would be nice to have an XML Schema (and others as well) version of | the DTD. It would. And perhaps for 3.0 we can. There is an experimental, possibly non-functioning, W3C XML Schema version in CVS. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | What good is a can of worms if you never open XML Standards Architect | it?--Bob Arning Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 09:55:50 UTC