- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:07:33 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- cc: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <spec-prod@w3.org>
True that the month number doesn't appear there in most things. The difference for whether the year is there or not is (roughly) whether the thing started after sometime in 2001, or whether it came from an earlier period when URIs were assigned as word collections (which it is harder to assure will be usefully unique in a few years). I didn't mean namespace in the sense of "XML Namespaces" as defined in the spec (the things that start with "key:"), I meant the range of identifiers taht can be provided as URIs on the W3C site. I realise he doesn't mean a single document - the single documents would be things like http://www.w3.org/2002/spec-prod/some.xsl (As counter examples, consider the things that do not get into the A-Z list, which tend to have a month number - http://www.w3org/2001/03/earl or http://www.w3.org/2001/08/rdfweb or whatever.) On the other hand, I think it would be better if someone with more direct responsibility gave this advice. I have copied DanC, as my friendly representative on the W3C management Team and one of the poeple I would ask in Norm's place. (Dan, if it isn't you I should ask, sorry in advance). Chaals On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Paul Grosso wrote: But Norm is neither talking about a namespace name nor a single document. Go to http://www.w3.org/ and run your mouse over the list of URLs under "W3C A to Z". You don't see a single URL with a month number in it, and most of them don't have a year number in it either. I would think that's more like the kind of thing he's talking about. paul At 08:45 2002 03 18 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >Hi Norm, > >yep, w3.org/spec-prod is too high. > >In general, you would be probably want something like >http://www.w3.org/2002/03/spec-prod (and that doesn't change when you want to >add some more stuff next month/year - it is just a way to be "reasonably >sure" that there aren't going to be big collisions in namespace 4 years >away...) > >Cheers > >Chaals > >On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Norman Walsh wrote: > > I've been meaning to setup a homepage for the xmlspec stylesheets so > that I can, for example, make proper releases. I have CVS write access > to the W3C site, but I don't feel comfortable making up the URI. > > Can someone on the team name a directory for me, please? Perhaps > http://www.w3.org/spec-prod except that I expect that's too high up > the hierarchy. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > > >-- >Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 >W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 >Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia >(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France) -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 18 March 2002 10:07:42 UTC