- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:51:51 +0100
- To: chairs@w3.org, spec-prod@w3.org
Misha.Wolf@reuters.com writes: > > Hi Janet, > > As pubrules are under discussion, I'd like to raise the matter > of the errata link in RECs. A couple of months ago, it was > proposed that this be moved into the "header", rather than stay > buried in the SoTD section. I forget where it was discussed, > but there appeared to be consensus to make this change. I see > that it has not been implemented, eg: > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-WebCGM/ > What is the next step? That discussion[3][4] led to the sample Rec[1] being modified. It now shows a compact way of adding not only errata, but also translations and alternative formats in the head. But it is true that the sample is two clicks away from the pubrules[2]. Ian promised that somebody from the comm team would change the text, so, while waiting for that, I just added a direct link to the sample Rec. [1] http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/REC-sample [2] http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2001OctDec/0011.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2001OctDec/0008.html Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos/ W3C/INRIA bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2001 08:51:54 UTC