- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:44:03 -0500
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
- Cc: reagle@w3.org, danc@w3.org, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Hello all, Would people be interested in discussing specification production issues at the W3C working group event [1]? I propose a meeting during the BOF lunch on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 [2]. Let me know if you're interested and what you would like to discuss. My interest stems from using an XHTML source and XSLT to generate the newest versions of WCAG 2.0 (based on the work of Charles McCathieNevile and the source for ATAG). Although I think the spec-prod dtd is cleaner, due to constraints of the human editors I am working with, using XHTML will make the process much easier. There are others on the W3C team who are interested in using XHTML and there was a suggestion that we discuss the classes that we are using. Perhaps we can create a standard set of classes to use with XHTML if one prefers to use that instead of the spec-prod dtd? However, I am not completely convinced that using classes and XHTML will give me as much granularity and control as I would like. Therefore, a discussion with the folks who developed the spec-prod dtd would be interesting. I would like to know if XHTML was considered. If it was, were there things that you couldn't do with XHTML and classes that you could with the spec-prod dtd. Or was XHTML not available at the time the spec-prod dtd was created? Are there other issues to discuss? Is there follow-up from the 15 August meeting [3] that needs to happen? Be well, --wendy [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/02/allgroupoverview [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/02/Plenary/Agenda.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2000JulSep/0028.html -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2001 11:38:58 UTC