- From: Philipp Hoschka <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:34:23 +0200
- To: smil-editors@w3.org
------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: lynda@cwi.nl Delivery-Date: Wed Jun 10 12:29 MET 199 Return-Path: <lynda@cwi.nl> Received: from sophia.inria.fr by www45.inria.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA23325 for <hoschka@www45.inria.fr>; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:29:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from www10.w3.org by sophia.inria.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA14138 for <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:30:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.1]) by www10.w3.org (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA22647 for <hoschka@w3.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 06:30:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trawler.cwi.nl (trawler.cwi.nl [192.16.196.180]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP id MAA15208 for <hoschka@w3.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:30:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost by trawler.cwi.nl with ESMTP id MAA13346; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:30:09 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <UTC199806101030.MAA13346.lynda@trawler.cwi.nl> To: Philipp Hoschka <hoschka@w3.org> Subject: Minor corrections to spec Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:30:09 +0200 From: Lynda Hardman <Lynda.Hardman@cwi.nl> Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1127 Abstract, 3rd para "Section _1_ presents the specification approach." 4.2.3, Element Attributes, "clip-end" The sentence should start "The clip-end attribute". 4.5.2, Attributes, coords "see Figure 4.7" should be 4.5. Next sentence "If a coordinate is specified as a percentage value". I got the impression from the rest of the spec. that we don't do percentages at all, that everything is pixel based [[not my first choice, personally]]. This makes the sentence true but meaningless. next paragraph "exceeding height and width" -> "excessive ..." ? 4.5.2, Examples, no. 4 You use the "ref" element, whereas "animation" is one of the recomended names for a media object element. I suggest changing the ref to animation. (Given the fifth paragraph of 4.2.3 which suggests this.) It wasn't quite clear (to me) which part of the spec is normative. Is it the English language description (sections 2 to 4) or the DTD in section 5 (which states it isn't normative)? (Don't waste time emailing me, just make sure you know that it is right in the spec.) Tonight at 6pm is the decision, right?? Scarey.... Lynda ------- End of Forwarded Message
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 1998 06:34:28 UTC