Re: discrepancy re. github policy for CGs

Le 02/03/2023 à 14:52, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit :
> On 02/03/2023 14:45, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>> There are hacks that allows to do client-side redirects from 
>> - e.g. 
> This could do it. But we can't use that trick for a whole directory, 
> this needs to be created for each individual file, right? (which should 
> be feasible, although a little tedious)
>> If that's not sufficient or acceptable, maybe we could give an 
>> exception to allow continued usage of the w3c org since the policy 
>> didn't really discuss or consider that situation?
> I expect that a significant number of CGs are using GH pages, so this 
> should be a real issue if migration is required/encouraged...

To clarify, I agree with Ian there is no plan at the moment of asking 
existing CGs to migrate out of the org; if that were to happen, clearly 
we would want to set up some tooling to facilitate setting up these 


Received on Thursday, 2 March 2023 13:54:08 UTC