- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:53:50 +0100
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org
Le 02/03/2023 à 14:52, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit : > > On 02/03/2023 14:45, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >> There are hacks that allows to do client-side redirects from >> w3c.github.io - e.g. >> https://github.com/w3c/w3c.github.io/blob/main/DOM-Level-3-Events-code/index.html > This could do it. But we can't use that trick for a whole directory, > this needs to be created for each individual file, right? (which should > be feasible, although a little tedious) >> >> If that's not sufficient or acceptable, maybe we could give an >> exception to allow continued usage of the w3c org since the policy >> didn't really discuss or consider that situation? > I expect that a significant number of CGs are using GH pages, so this > should be a real issue if migration is required/encouraged... To clarify, I agree with Ian there is no plan at the moment of asking existing CGs to migrate out of the org; if that were to happen, clearly we would want to set up some tooling to facilitate setting up these redirects. Dom
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2023 13:54:08 UTC