- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:01:40 +0200
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Site Comments <site-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADyR_r0SYFv8+_BGY16=3ooK0Z-5Wm3JyxG53sKZq68bbntM2A@mail.gmail.com>
They are already available at those URLs. Thanks for the quick response and your support! Regards, On 26 Aug 2013 15:26, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org> wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2013, at 5:46 AM, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> > wrote: > > > On 13 August 2013 20:43, Ian Jacobs wrote: > > > > Hi Ian, > > > >> I'm back from vacation. Please let me know how you would like to > proceed. > > > > Thank you for your response. I finally could have a look again at this > issue. > > > >> Some options that come to mind: > > > >> * Leave things as they are, with two drafts listed on the CG home page. > >> * Remove one of the drafts and replace the "latest version URI" with a > URI to a group > >> wiki page (or Wordpress page) that lists all the drafts. > >> * Remove one of the drafts (say, the later one) and edit the > specification in place at > >> http://expath.org/spec/binary/20130312 > > > > I think the ideal solution would to adapt the links to the W3C > > Community Groups conventions, namely having one draft per report (so > > removing the second one) pointing to a permanent URL with always the > > latest version of the draft (since we name different versions of the > > drafts, I've added a redirection from */latest to the latest draft). > > So could you: > > > > 1) remove the second publication announcement for "Binary Module" > > dated 2013-08-03 > > > > 2) adapt the URLs of the drafts by changing the date at the end with > "latest" > > > > That is from the current list at the top of the EXPath CG homepage: > > > > 2012-07-18 Packaging System <http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20120509> > > 2012-07-23 File Module <http://expath.org/spec/file/20120614> > > 2013-03-13 Binary Module < > http://expath.org/spec/binary/20130312> > > 2013-04-03 Web Applications < > http://expath.org/spec/webapp/20130401> > > 2013-08-03 Binary Module < > http://expath.org/spec/binary/20130731> > > > > to the following: > > > > 2012-07-18 Packaging System <http://expath.org/spec/pkg/latest> > > 2012-07-23 File Module <http://expath.org/spec/file/latest> > > 2013-03-13 Binary Module <http://expath.org/spec/binary/latest > > > > 2013-04-03 Web Applications <http://expath.org/spec/webapp/latest> > > > > I think this is what respects best the CG conventions… > > That looks fine. Let me know when the specs are available at those URIs. > I'll ask the > Systems Team to do both of those actions. > > Note: This week the W3C staff is working on other projects as well and on > our end the changes may not > happen immediately. > > Ian > > > > > Thank you for your help! Best regards, > > > > -- > > Florent Georges > > http://fgeorges.org/ > > http://h2oconsulting.be/ > > > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > > >
Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 17:02:09 UTC