- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 22:37:38 -0500
- To: Joseph Becher <jwbecher@gmail.com>
- Cc: site-comments <site-comments@w3.org>
On 3 May 2010, at 8:42 PM, Joseph Becher wrote: > On http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.3 it states > that the rev attribute should be used for reverse links, but on that > page and others I observed that you use the rel attribute for the > 'Previous' link. Is there a reason for this? Hi Joseph, I think this is the explanation: Chapter 2 has a "previous" chapter (Chapter 1). Thus, from the perspective of Chapter 2, I want to specify the "previous" relationship (rel) to Chapter 1. In Chapter 2 I write: <link href="Chapter1" rel="prev"/> Suppose I also wanted to say within Chapter 1 that Chapter 1 is the previous chapter of Chapter 2. I could write this in Chapter 1: <link href="Chapter2" rev="prev"/> I used the "prev" relationship, but you could do this with another link type [1]. For instance, from the cover page: <link href="copyright.html" rel="copyright"/> and from copyright.html, to say "I am the copyright statement of the cover page," you could say: <link href="cover.html" rev="copyright"/> That, at least, is my understanding: rel and rev allow you to describe a relationship and its inverse. A search around the Web suggests that rev is not used much. I believe HTML5 deprecates it [2]. _ Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-links [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/obsolete.html -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 03:37:41 UTC