- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:16:14 -0500
- To: Sandra Silva <sssilva@comcast.net>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org
On 26 Aug 2009, at 11:34 AM, Sandra Silva wrote: > To whom it may concern, > > Not quite sure how important being validated with W3C is but I did > validate 5 of my pages so far for XHTML Strict. Please help a > sister out here, though, I notice talk on your site about html 5 and > want to know if I am wasting my time validating for XHTML Strict? > IE makes my pages look different that Safari or FireFox which is a > known problem for any code on any website. What do you recommend? I > have 20 more pages to correct and don't want to waste time and I > would rather do it right the first time. Any quick response and > help is appreciated. : ) Hello Sandra, HTML 5 is not yet a standard. You could also try XHTML 1.0 Transitional or even HTML 4 Transitional. If the page looks different on various browsers (especially comparing IE6 with Safari/Firefox), then it is likely an issue of style sheets (CSS) rather than HTML. Unfortunately I won't be able to help you debug that issue. But there is a lot of information available through search engines about designing CSS to work across browsers. You might start at "A List Apart" for some pointers. _ Ian > > Newbie at this stuff, > God bless, > Sandy > http://muralsandfauxpainting.com > > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 17:16:24 UTC