- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:22:14 +0000
- To: Rick Bullotta <rick.bullotta@comcast.net>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org, www-ws@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1164702134.13245.53.camel@localhost>
Hello Rick, The editors' names in the spec are links with email addresses. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl I suggest you write to one or more of them. I am not sure whether W3C's WSDL 2.0 specification has the same error; if it does, please find the address for comments in the status section of that document. Thank you for the heads-up, _ Ian On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 07:21 +0000, Rick Bullotta wrote: > Hello! > > > > After much hair pulling attempting to get a certain WSDL test scenario > to work, I realized that there is a substantial error in the WSDL 1.1 > specification/technical report. > > > > In numerous cases in the document, the service-to-port binding: > > > > <service name="StockQuoteService"> > > <documentation>My first > service</documentation> > > <port name="StockQuotePort" > binding="tns:StockQuoteBinding"> > > <soap:address > location="http://example.com/stockquote"/> > > </port> > > </service> > > > > …should actually be…. > > > > <service name="StockQuoteService"> > > <documentation>My first > service</documentation> > > <port name="StockQuotePort" > binding="tns:StockQuoteSoapBinding"> > > <soap:address > location="http://example.com/stockquote"/> > > </port> > > </service> > > > > Note the change from “StockQuoteBinding” to “StockQuoteSoapBinding”. > > > > To whom should this be reported? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Rick Bullotta > > SAP Labs, LLC > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 08:25:26 UTC