- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:21:12 -0500
- To: "Rick Bullotta" <rick.bullotta@comcast.net>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org, www-ws@w3.org, www-ws-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFE0D175E3.B2353FAA-ON85257234.0048FA77-85257234.00495973@us.ibm.com>
W3C does not maintain the WSDL1.1 specification. I would suggest a look at the WS-I profiles, as they have addressed most of the errata for SOAP1.1 and WSDL1.1. http://ws-i.org/ Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris phone: +1 508 377 9295 www-ws-request@w3.org wrote on 11/24/2006 09:19:42 AM: > Hello! > > After much hair pulling attempting to get a certain WSDL test > scenario to work, I realized that there is a substantial error in > the WSDL 1.1 specification/technical report. > > In numerous cases in the document, the service-to-port binding: > > <service name="StockQuoteService"> > <documentation>My first service</documentation> > <port name="StockQuotePort" binding="tns: > StockQuoteBinding"> > <soap:address location="http: > //example.com/stockquote"/> > </port> > </service> > > ?should actually be?. > > <service name="StockQuoteService"> > <documentation>My first service</documentation> > <port name="StockQuotePort" binding="tns: > StockQuoteSoapBinding"> > <soap:address location="http: > //example.com/stockquote"/> > </port> > </service> > > Note the change from ?StockQuoteBinding? to ?StockQuoteSoapBinding?. > > To whom should this be reported? > > Best regards, > > Rick Bullotta > SAP Labs, LLC
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 13:22:01 UTC