- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 08:06:41 -0500
- To: Art.Barstow@nokia.com
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1116940001.4404.38.camel@seabright>
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 07:10 -0400, Art.Barstow@nokia.com wrote: > A fundamental mistake in your reasoning is > making the following equivalency: > > The W3C's MWI == Mobile Web > > This would appear to be a good issue to discuss > with your MWI "Steering Committee". I wonder if > they will agree with the Comm Team's decision. I am also looking forward to working with the MWI participants on a number of mobile-specific brochures, and I suspect that that work will have an impact on the more general materials. - Ian > Regards, > > Art Barstow > --- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ext Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] > > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 10:22 PM > > To: Barstow Art (Nokia-TP/Boston) > > Cc: site-comments@w3.org > > Subject: Re: The W3C Technology Stack > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 08:43 -0400, Art.Barstow@nokia.com wrote: > > > Why is the "Mobile Web" depicted as a vertical > > > technology silo in the W3C Technology Stack in > > > [1]? > > > > > > Please see Nokia's position paper for the W3C's > > > November 2004 Mobile Web Initiative Workshop [2] > > > for an alternative positioning of the Mobile Web - > > > where the Mobile Web is a horizontal function and > > > not a vertical technology silo. > > > > Hi Art, > > > > We discussed your suggestion in the Comm Team. While there > > is general agreement with you that Mobile Web affects various > > parts of W3C work, we prefer to to leave Mobile Web in the > > diagram as a vertical rather than horizontal activity. > > The two primary reasons are: > > > > * We would like to give additional visibility to Mobile > > Web at this time. > > > > * The MWI groups are not chartered with the same expectation > > of horizontal review as other horizontal groups. Naturally, > > some cross-group review is expected, but I do not believe > > the commitment is at the same level as say, within WAI. > > > > We review this sort of diagram periodically and may very well > > adopt your suggestion in a future version. Thank you for the > > input. > > > > Best, > > > > - Ian > > > > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/technology.html#techstack > > > [2] > > http://www.w3.org/2004/10/MWIWS-papers/MWI-Nokia-Position-2004 > -10-15.pdf -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2005 13:06:50 UTC