- From: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 07:10:02 -0400
- To: <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: <site-comments@w3.org>
A fundamental mistake in your reasoning is making the following equivalency: The W3C's MWI == Mobile Web This would appear to be a good issue to discuss with your MWI "Steering Committee". I wonder if they will agree with the Comm Team's decision. Regards, Art Barstow --- > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 10:22 PM > To: Barstow Art (Nokia-TP/Boston) > Cc: site-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: The W3C Technology Stack > > > On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 08:43 -0400, Art.Barstow@nokia.com wrote: > > Why is the "Mobile Web" depicted as a vertical > > technology silo in the W3C Technology Stack in > > [1]? > > > > Please see Nokia's position paper for the W3C's > > November 2004 Mobile Web Initiative Workshop [2] > > for an alternative positioning of the Mobile Web - > > where the Mobile Web is a horizontal function and > > not a vertical technology silo. > > Hi Art, > > We discussed your suggestion in the Comm Team. While there > is general agreement with you that Mobile Web affects various > parts of W3C work, we prefer to to leave Mobile Web in the > diagram as a vertical rather than horizontal activity. > The two primary reasons are: > > * We would like to give additional visibility to Mobile > Web at this time. > > * The MWI groups are not chartered with the same expectation > of horizontal review as other horizontal groups. Naturally, > some cross-group review is expected, but I do not believe > the commitment is at the same level as say, within WAI. > > We review this sort of diagram periodically and may very well > adopt your suggestion in a future version. Thank you for the > input. > > Best, > > - Ian > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/technology.html#techstack > > [2] > http://www.w3.org/2004/10/MWIWS-papers/MWI-Nokia-Position-2004 -10-15.pdf -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:10:09 UTC