Re: Microsoft's Fabric IQ: Anyone have any early experience wrt RDF connectivity?

Hi, looking at:

https://share.google/aimode/RAynnl2JZXUcz2EMt

Not without being a little presumptuous, this Google description of the
product resembles, for me at least, the description of an open source
project I'm having in planning stage for a while and it is RDF (quads)
based:

https://sebxama.blogspot.com/2026/03/applications-of-large-graph-model.html

Best,
Sebastián.


On Wed, Apr 1, 2026, 2:43 PM Adrian Gschwend <ml-ktk@netlabs.org> wrote:

> On 01.04.2026 22:18, John.Domingue [He/Him] wrote:
>
> > Hi I'm having conversations with our own IT teams on the merits or not
> > of adopting Microsoft's Fabric IQ especially in relation to
> > interoperability with web standards.
>  >
> > Anyone have any experience with this?
>
> Unless I missed something, this was just recently announced so if anyone
> says they have experience with it, I would argue that this is a bit of a
> stretch.
>
>  From what I've read and seen I would say it's kind of an non-RDF R2RML
> mapper on top of tables. Similar to what Palantir Foundry does, they
> also talk about ontologies without meaning RDF ontologies. And in both
> systems, the data does not really live in a graph, at least not behind
> the scenes.
>
> There is also this vibe-coded thing here:
>
> https://github.com/microsoft/Ontology-Playground
>
> Which at least talks about RDF import/export (I have not tried).
>
> What it does do IMO is validate that we the Semantic Web people were
> right all the time :-D
>
> How useful it will be in regards to true web standards like RDF remains
> to be seen, to early to tell IMO.
>
> regards
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
>