Re: Visualizing impacts of US policies on global programs and objectives

Milton, I'll be more than happy to participate in any effort that may be mounted to render in StratML format the visions, values, goals, objectives, and stakeholders that are implicit in Executive Orders, OMB Circulars, and other policy documents.
See, for example, these EOs from President Trump's first term:

American Leadership in Artificial IntelligenceReorganization of the Executive BranchPromoting the Use of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Federal Government

While AI was not used in converting those documents, Claude.ai and ChatGPT have learned to transform relevant content into StratML format relatively well, although they do seem to need repeated reminders not only to validate their output against the schema but also to apply good practices for naming and sequencing goals and objectives.
BTW, as revealed by this query, 242 of the 6,285 plans currently in the StratML collection reference "ocean" and 24 have relevant goals and objectives. 
52 reference the SDGs. and sustainability ranks in the top 25 most frequently cited values.  Innovation ranks third, below only transparency and accountability.
Education is the most frequently cited goal, and among objectives, it ranks below only partnerships, training, and collaboration.
Grok enhanced the StratML stylesheet to color code numeric performance indicators falling above and below the baseline averages.  See, for example, the human freedom reports for 165 countries.
Also, BTW, the International Science Council's strategic plan is now available in StratML format at https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#ISC or, more specifically, https://stratml.us/docs/ISC.xml  It would be great if they could become a Truly Connected community of results (CoR).
I'm looking forward to seeing what you can do and to learning how I might be able to help.
Owen Amburhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/
 

    On Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 12:34:44 PM EDT, Milton Ponson <rwiciamsd@gmail.com> wrote:   

 Dear all,
Sorry for crossposting, but the question I have is of general audience character and significance.
Within the framework of global programs, both at United Nations and European Union, ASEAN and other regional bodies level I am trying to establish in a visual way the impacts and ramifications of current US policies with regard to humanitarian and relief aid, global programs for health, climate action, biodiversity conservation, environmental protection, human rights and sustainability.
And in particular for the scientific, technological, educational and innovation infrastructures for all of  these and other important issues.
As objects to map to I intend to use UN bodies and their main defining treaties and subsequent programs that have targets defined (e.g. Paris Accord for climate change, the Sustainable Development Goals and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and at a later stage similar bodies and programs with targets set for regional organizations.
As input objects I will use Executive Orders and corresponding policy objectives and targets and DOGE funding, staffing and program cuts.
Which visual graph based tools, ontologies and semantic web based tools are best suited to create visualizations that can also be exported to graphic formats suitable for infographics.
I am aiming to create such visualizations for the upcoming 3rd UN Ocean Conference to be held in Nice, France 9-13 June next (https://sdgs.un.org/conferences/ocean2025/about-unoc-2025).These visualizations are intended primarily to signal effects on the scientific, technological, educational and innovation infrastructures.
Some websites currently tracking changes in the USA are:https://donortracker.org/publications/budget-cuts-trackerhttps://www.project2025.observer/https://www.fastcompany.com/91286705/project-2025-tracker-website-trump-second-term
I would also like to know if anyone has used AI to distill the strategic planning behind these policies that can be converted to StratML format.
Right now NO trackers exist to show the ramifications for science, technology, education and innovation. The International Science Council is making recommendations for a recalibration but I think it is important that we maintain US science, technology and innovation capabilities as a key objective as well.
In order to do so we need to quantify and qualify impacts and ramifications for both US and international audiences.
And we may even be able to get (private sector) funding at EU and US levels for trackers, projects and reports.

Milton PonsonRainbow Warriors Core FoundationCIAMSD Institute-ICT4D Program+2977459312PO Box 1154, OranjestadAruba, Dutch Caribbean