- From: Vincent Emonet <vincent.emonet@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:58:26 +0100
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+u3sY0QDrswN5=GC_VACNp9XyTbxZBvXLsSmVOt0np0F9pYrg@mail.gmail.com>
> > you mean, something like that ? :-) > > I use the IDLab Turtle Validator <http://ttl.summerofcode.be/> I don't think, this one only does validation, only for turtle! Or is there a plan to add more syntaxes support and conversion? From my point of view it should offer at least: * conversion to a chosen format ( * support for most popular syntaxes (including JSON-LD ideally) Having a validator is ok, having a converter is much better. And developing a converter over a validator does not require a lot more work, as we should be able to use the same libraries that are used for validation (parsers/serializers) So in one small website we tackle 2 needs of the semantic web community: quick validation and conversation I'll be happy to help with setting this up if people are interested :) Vincent Le jeu. 23 nov. 2023 à 19:20, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org> a écrit : > > On 23/11/2023 15:42, Vincent Emonet wrote: > > (...) > From my point of view: > - A minimal modern validator should at least enable users to provide RDF > in various format (the classic xml, turtle, trig, n3, nquads, ntriples, > ideally it could even support JSON-LD). > - And it should enable users to convert from any formats to any other > format (if you can do parsing, you can also do serializing, so why not > doing both?) > - Ideally it should be implemented to work fully on the client (because > decentralization, and scalability, and we have now good JS/wasm options to > parse in the browser now), so that it can be deployed to any CDN without > the cost of hosting a server. If people needs an API we can find a way to > setup a client-side API (look like an API, query like an API, but execution > on the client) > > you mean, something like that ? :-) > > (disclaimer: this is a very rough and early prototype) > > The reason I asked the 2nd point was precisely to determine whether this > prototype could be a satisfactory replacement from the current ageing > validator. > > > > Best, > > Vincent > > > Le mer. 22 nov. 2023 à 13:46, <hans..teijgeler@quicknet.nl > <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>> a écrit : > >> Hi Pierre-Antoine, >> >> >> >> I use the IDLab Turtle Validator <http://ttl.summerofcode.be/> >> >> >> >> Regards, Hans >> >
Received on Friday, 24 November 2023 14:58:43 UTC