Re: Do you use the W3C RDF validator ?

Hi pa, I presume that should read "client-side option/in the browser".

If so, I have used the service in the past to test remote services that are
not accessible from the client-side. But overall I could probably easily
host the service in-house to compensate for its utility if you plan to take
it down.

If you ask for a vote, I would say keep it on the W3C site. That way I can
trust the service somewhat or at least I would know who to contact in case
there is an issue.

Best,
Marco


On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:41 AM Pierre-Antoine Champin <
pierre-antoine@w3.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> the code behind the W3C RDF validator [1] is old and unmaintained. W3C
> is considering decommissioning that service.
>
> My first question is: how many people in this community are relying on
> that service ? My intuition is that the answer is "not many", but if I'm
> wrong, we might reconsider our decision.
>
> My second question is: for those who use that service or a similiar one
> : would a purely client-size option be acceptable ? In other words, are
> you using it exclusively in a browser, or are you accessing it as an API
> from other programs?
>
>    best
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
>
>

-- 


---
Marco Neumann