Re: The AIDA Dashboard: a new tool for analysing research in Computer Science

On 2022-09-20 11:12, Francesco.Osborne wrote:
> It is not easy since it requires a deep understanding of natural language (to do it automatically) or a new set of strong incentives (to convince researchers to do it).


Certainly top-down and bottom-up approaches are complementary, and we'd 
benefit by employing both.

Aren't humans involved either way somewhere in the process?

If the author is not involved in reviewing the third-party generated 
information (whether it is done by a machine or a living thing) about a 
research finding, then essentially "anyone can say anything about 
anything" - not to imply that this is a judgement about the quality of 
the output.

Are there strong incentives for authors to accept third-party generated 
conclusions or annotations without being in the loop? Who would be 
willing to base their research solely on the query results of 
third-party generated information (as opposed to author's own statements)?

Do we need additional services to do fact-checking by comparing the 
authoritative claims made by the authors of the original content with 
the ones generated by other third-parties?

What's the incentive-delta between researchers to continue with their 
ways (as instructed and controlled by third-party publishers) and to 
make their research findings human- and machine-readable?

 From the millions of articles the CS-KG processed, are there any 
statements about my articles? I'd be very interested in seeing a 
comparison of the top-down and bottom-up approaches. Is that something 
you can demonstrate, perhaps using my dissertation as an example? 
Perhaps more specifically, can we check semantic and contextual citations?

I didn't get around to it - PRs are welcome - but I would like my 
authoring tool to make top-down suggestions (in addition to the current 
bottom-up approach) so I can authoritatively enrich the "knowledge 
graph" of URIs in which that I am the "owner" during the authoring stage.

-Sarven
https://csarven.ca/#i

Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2022 21:44:23 UTC