Re: The AIDA Dashboard: a new tool for analysing research in Computer Science

As a nurse - I have some understanding of semantic web, theory and applications.(Disappointed I will miss the Real AI 2022: http://www.bcs-sgai.org/realai2022 )

Re. Sarven and Margaret's replies ...
Is Sarven's list pointing to what might be needed for argument-ation (OU work here and previous applications I think)?
I tried AIDA Dashboard as per my context:
'Nursing (two results), Health, Hodges(') model' - sadly nothing on Hodges' model - my focus - as expected.

The underlying data for AIDA  is clearly vast - as in the download options.

Margaret's reply and reference to 'richer structures' reminds me of Hodges' model as a foundation for 'rich picture' construction (Checkland).
This model, provides a generic conceptual framework, whereas many researchers seek to find a conceptual framework as part of their project.

[ The model is one of those 2x2 matrices as oft presented on many flip charts, as a mind map though there is an underlying structure. ].

Hodges' model is situated, and is universal in scope - as such it provides the - conceptual degrees of freedom - you may seek?

I am still wondering what Hodges' model is - including its relation to 'general intelligence'?
h2cm = 'GI - General Intelligence'?
The model (pictured in the sidebar of the blog above) was created in nurse/health education to facilitate:   
   - reflection, critical thinking;
   - person-centredness;
   - bridging theory-practice gap;
   - holistic, integrated care
I believe there is an implicit theory in Hodges' model (language for one!). Not mentioned recently but perhaps the model can function as an 'information portal' - as determined by the user?

I have carried for many the project of a 'Reflective Workbench' for student(s) nurses - other learners to replace a now archived website:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110903070641/http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/links.htm
In a search for theoretical underpinnings I can (possibly) draw upon Gärdenfors' conceptual spaces, threshold concepts (Meyer and Land).
Not a mathematician but in awe of how maths can describe our worlds (and diagrams), I'm trying to find a 'hook' to utilise category theory even in a rudimentary manner.[ and have many notes! :-) ] I may be asking too much of Hodges' model and myself.

The model reflects nurse/health care professional's values in presenting a blank template - none judgemental, universal regards.
Informationally, this invites data overload - high redundancy, but when we meet a person for assessment, care planning, we then select what is salient.
Essentially, we place the person at the center of the model.

I was struck this week by a letter (FT) re. The Pantheon in Rome and must check.Apparently, from an engineering perspective with the oculus, the roof is stronger than if it were solid.
Hodges' model provides a 'space' at its center - for assurance- inspiration...

RIP QE II
Kind regards

Peter Jones
Community Mental Health Nurse, Tutor & Researcher
Warrington Community Recovery Team
NW England
Blogging at "Welcome to the QUAD"
http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/h2cm 

    On Thursday, 15 September 2022 at 03:16:08 BST, Margaret Warren <mm@zeroexp.com> wrote:  
 
 I have to say +1 to this question Sarven asks.

As many on this list know, with ImageSnippets - we uniquely parse the 
image description content itself to linked data triples using a small 
relations ontology designed by myself and Pat Hayes. There are many 
systems that can structure a field called: Subject or Keywords while 
continuing to allow the value of that field to be a list of plain text 
words; but it's much harder to parse out entities from the actual 
content. And even beyond that - it's much easier now to resolve entities 
in the body of text, but it still lacks the relational structure that 
Sarven listed. In fact, it seems his list: "problem statements, 
motivation, hypothesis, arguments, workflow steps, methodology, design, 
results, evaluation, conclusions, future challenges, as well as all 
inline semantic citations (to name a few) where they are uniquely 
identified and related to other data"

is insightful all on it's own as a guide to what those relations might be.

Not taking away from what a nice dashboard this is, but it's just such a 
great question Sarven asks, because the really interesting work is to 
translate the descriptive data into much richer structures.

Margaret

On 9/14/2022 4:48 AM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
> On 2022-09-14 10:11, Angelo Salatino wrote:
>> As a joint effort between Springer Nature, the Open University, and 
>> the University of Cagliari, we recently launched the AIDA Dashboard 
>> [1], https://w3id.org/aida/dashboard 
>> <https://w3id.org/aida/dashboard>, an innovative tool for exploring 
>> and making sense of the dynamics of research topics, scientific 
>> conferences and journals in Computer Science.
>
>
> Is there an innovative tool for querying or exploring significant 
> units of information in research findings and making sense of the 
> dynamics of research topics, scientific conferences and journals in 
> Computer Science?
>
> Is it possible to discover problem statements, motivation, hypothesis, 
> arguments, workflow steps, methodology, design, results, evaluation, 
> conclusions, future challenges, as well as all inline semantic 
> citations (to name a few) where they are uniquely identified and 
> related to other data?
>
> If not, why not?
>
> -Sarven
> https://csarven.ca/#i