Re: The AIDA Dashboard: a new tool for analysing research in Computer Science

I have to say +1 to this question Sarven asks.

As many on this list know, with ImageSnippets - we uniquely parse the 
image description content itself to linked data triples using a small 
relations ontology designed by myself and Pat Hayes. There are many 
systems that can structure a field called: Subject or Keywords while 
continuing to allow the value of that field to be a list of plain text 
words; but it's much harder to parse out entities from the actual 
content. And even beyond that - it's much easier now to resolve entities 
in the body of text, but it still lacks the relational structure that 
Sarven listed. In fact, it seems his list: "problem statements, 
motivation, hypothesis, arguments, workflow steps, methodology, design, 
results, evaluation, conclusions, future challenges, as well as all 
inline semantic citations (to name a few) where they are uniquely 
identified and related to other data"

is insightful all on it's own as a guide to what those relations might be.

Not taking away from what a nice dashboard this is, but it's just such a 
great question Sarven asks, because the really interesting work is to 
translate the descriptive data into much richer structures.

Margaret

On 9/14/2022 4:48 AM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
> On 2022-09-14 10:11, Angelo Salatino wrote:
>> As a joint effort between Springer Nature, the Open University, and 
>> the University of Cagliari, we recently launched the AIDA Dashboard 
>> [1], https://w3id.org/aida/dashboard 
>> <https://w3id.org/aida/dashboard>, an innovative tool for exploring 
>> and making sense of the dynamics of research topics, scientific 
>> conferences and journals in Computer Science.
>
>
> Is there an innovative tool for querying or exploring significant 
> units of information in research findings and making sense of the 
> dynamics of research topics, scientific conferences and journals in 
> Computer Science?
>
> Is it possible to discover problem statements, motivation, hypothesis, 
> arguments, workflow steps, methodology, design, results, evaluation, 
> conclusions, future challenges, as well as all inline semantic 
> citations (to name a few) where they are uniquely identified and 
> related to other data?
>
> If not, why not?
>
> -Sarven
> https://csarven.ca/#i

Received on Thursday, 15 September 2022 02:09:59 UTC