Re: Should we extend xsd:decimal?

What is Apache Jena 10.0.2? just a typo?

Marco

On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 10:40 AM Pierre-Antoine Champin <
pierre-antoine@w3.org> wrote:

> Dear Semantic Web community,
>
> an issue has been raised some time ago about the DCAT-3 specification
> [1], related to the use of `xsd:decimal` as the range a property, and
> how a seemingly correct JSON-LD document may produce ill-formed
> `xsd:decimal` literals [2].
>
> Exploring the possible solutions to this issue, I came to the conclusion
> that
>
> - it is a shame that `xsd:decimal` does not support the E notation [3]
> just like `xsd:double` does, and
> - actually, many implementations (of RDF, SPARQL, OWL...) do support the
> E notation for `xsd:decimal`.
>
> I created a github repo at
>
>      http://github.com/pchampin/xsd_decimal
>
> to document this issue and the current state of implementations, and
> discuss whether updating the normative definition of `xsd:decimal` would
> be a good idea or not.
>
> Please chime in if you are interested
>
>    pa
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1536
> [2]
>
> https://json-ld.org/playground/#startTab=tab-nquads&json-ld=%7B%22%40context%22%3A%7B%22ex%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2Fns%2F%22%2C%22xsd%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2FXMLSchema%23%22%2C%22ex%3Afoo%22%3A%7B%22%40type%22%3A%22xsd%3Adecimal%22%7D%7D%2C%22ex%3Afoo%22%3A%5B12.3%5D%7D
> [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation#E_notation
>
>

-- 


---
Marco Neumann