Semantic Web Interest Group Hello. I was recently reading about probabilistic semantics and considering notational options with respect to N3. Brainstorming, we could, in a manner resembling other @-based directives in N3, express: @p(0.95) . { domain:X domain:r domain:Y . } Also, beyond [0, 1] scalars per fuzzy logic, there are multivalued logics, e.g., neutrosophic logics which describe every logical variable x as being described by a triple: x = (t, f, i), where t is the degree of truth, f is the degree of false, and i is the level of indeterminacy. We could express this in a manner resembling: @p(t: 0.95, f: 0.05, i: 0.0) . { domain:X domain:r domain:Y . } What do you think of these syntactic options for expressing probabilistic semantics in N3-based languages? Do any other ideas come to mind for notations with which to express probabilistic semantics in N3-based languages? Thank you. Best regards, Adam SobieskiReceived on Thursday, 24 November 2022 06:34:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 November 2022 06:34:51 UTC