- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:05:38 -0400
- To: Paula Gearon <gearon@gmail.com>
- Cc: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 8/30/22 11:46, Paula Gearon wrote: > It would also be really nice to understand if there is a fundamental > reason for this limitation in OWL. > > I believe this is to help distinguish the ABox from the TBox. > . . . > OWL needs a list structure in > order to keep collections closed. This sounds to me like more evidence that RDF should have a built-in list type, rather than the makeshift first/next ladder that is currently used. David Booth
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2022 16:05:51 UTC