- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 08:26:15 -0400
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Aidan wrote: > I agree, but feel it important to clarify that the discussion on this > list -- even if it relates to security -- is not a problem. The problem > is if the discussion on this list is perceived as a "security review". Yes, exactly. > I think the discussion here can be fruitful for several reasons, even if > we are not security experts. Some thoughts along those lines: > > - A proof is a proof... > > - The issues being discussed here relate more to the definitions of RDF > datasets... > > - We are not inventing new cryptography... > > This is not to say that the input of security experts would not be > useful or anything of the sort... Yes, well said, thank you Aidan. It is important that we don't lose sight of the above (and it seems a few on the mailing list are losing sight of this). -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2021 12:26:31 UTC