- From: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 19:32:24 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
> On 16 Jun 2021, at 13:20, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 12:30, Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org> wrote: > I find myself wondering what is the point of a WG? > Is it not to discuss this sort of thing? > > W3C does not create new world wide web standards for the purpose of talking about them! Especially Security standards. Nope - a day later, I still don't understand why you say that in relation to WGs. And I wonder if it is some profound comment that I should understand. > > But yeah, maybe this thread can get wound up? Folks could cc www-archive@w3.org instead of semantic-web@ to keep a public papertrail? > > Dan > > Can't you guys have this discussion (argument) in a WG (or privately, if you prefer), and then report back to the list with a summary when there is something useful to report? > Please? > I'm interested, but not *that* interested. > Cheers > > -- > Hugh > 023 8061 5652 > > -- Hugh 023 8061 5652
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2021 18:32:59 UTC